- The Supreme Court will hear an independent debate on Nov. 3 on the second issue of the second amendment to the Constitution, which guarantees the right to remove weapons from the building.
• For twenty years, New York law has been challenged, requiring writers to provide a “reasonable basis” for permission to carry a gun hidden in public places.
• The plaintiffs ’complaints law, which states that these rules are inconsistent with the second amendment, was upheld by the lower courts.
The Supreme Court will discuss the arguments that opened Nov. 3 in the second major hearing for the implementation of constitutional gender rights, on Monday in the court calendar.
Judges said in April they were investigating a challenge from the National Rifle Society to enforce the law in New York by asking writers to try “reasonable grounds” to obtain a New York gun license. Public place.
The lower courts followed the laws of the opposition, arguing that those laws violated the Second Amendment. Proponents of his case are working to make a true translation of this statement available online.
“Repetition of an error does not justify an error, but only increases the need for the court to reconsider,” the Supreme Court told the court.
The Supreme Court reviewed an appeal against a decision, with nine judges each month appointed by the Republic.
The decision to sue could be a major change in the law under Vice President Donald Trump, who appointed Judges Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.
The decision of the government Supreme Court of the Defense Forces took place last decade, in which the Supreme Court, Annex 2, defended the right to possess firearms for self-defense.
Last year, the court refused to decide on another gun-important case in New York involving the nation’s most important law.
The case was heard in November in a 2018 lawsuit filed by the New York State Association of Rifles and Pistols by Robert Nash and Brandon Koch, two New Yorkers involved in gun control in public places for assistance.
The Licensing Authority has denied the allegations against Nashi and Kochi, saying it does not reflect the need for self-defense that identifies them from the community. “
A Syrian state judge dismissed the case in New York in December 2018, saying: “Nash and Koch do not meet” reasonable “requirements because they do not object or threaten the situation.”
The Court of Appeal upheld the lower court’s decision not to revoke the license.
The Supreme Court’s request to review the case said the move to appeal the case in support of New York law was “inappropriate.”
“According to him, the second amendment could “protect the constitutional right individually, “but the state could legally control the people and they (if any) would exercise that right,” he said.
The complaint was made by Paul Clement, a lawyer, under former President George W. Bush.
New York State Prosecutor Letitia James said in February that the Supreme Court should refuse to accept the case.
“This law is consistent with the Second Amendment and addresses the New York safety and crime prevention system,” James wrote in the complaint.