Achievable or Ambitious? A Comparative and Critical View of Government 3.0 in Korea-government.vision

Achievable or Ambitious? A Comparative and Critical View of Government 3.0 in Korea

ABSTRACT

Government 3.0 is the new model of public service in Korea. The previous administration (2013-2017) committed itself to transform public sector transformation through government 3.0 into a pilot project that reflected transparent, informed, and focused government. The document, which compares government 3.0 models as the core model in government 2.0 and different countries, discusses what the problems are and how the government can overcome them. There are problems. Government 3.0 seems to legislate a lot of software packages. A book is a way of marking a foundation, not a medicine. This is an attempt to send ordinary text messages to civil servants. Thorough information management can lead to similar results in the work of other civil servants and instability in the creation and organization of information. Because this law is different and distinct from political and political parties, interpretation may take a long time after the end of the presidency.

INTRODUCTION

Government 3.0 is the new model of public service in Korea. The previous administration (2013-2017) committed itself to transform public sector transformation through government 3.0 into a pilot project that reflected transparent, informed, and focused government. These measures constitute the four main elements of good governance and governance: openness, sharing, communication, and cooperation. These trends are becoming an increasingly important partner in world society with open government (see http://www.opengovpartnership.org/), so the 3.0 Korean government should be monitored around the world…

Compliance covers both expectations and concerns. In particular, the plight of teachers, writers, the general public, and even civil servants has led to serious criticism of the 3.0 government’s outcome. His paintings are impossible, as most of them were posted under Korean rule in a year or five. It can be argued that a good government of 3.0 is a sign of the first national system that can fully control programs. The international community should discuss the use of government 3.0 as a method of witchcraft, interested in the opportunities and challenges offered by this government. As for state efforts, there are many publications, but only a small portion of educational research can be read by the public. This article will explore in-depth the concerned heritage of globalization and how the global community can learn from Korean literature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *