Who Cares for Identity Information in Government 2.0? An Empirical Study-government.vision

Who Cares for Identity Information in Government 2.0? An Empirical Study


This chapter summarizes a study on the impact of data identification on Information government-citizen communication in 2.0 government systems. The data are taken from surveys of state 2.0 users and studies on the value and importance of the Dutch Information government’s 2.0 website. This makes it clear that Web 2.0 users are looking for other tangible and ready to offer them, the value of the public service knowledge base and the relationship with the public. The results show that, contrary to the recommendations of the literature, 2.0 government discussion forums do not have a positive relationship between moral values and the interaction of space. It has been argued that the government’s 2.0 efforts should be flexible and transparent.


“Web 2.0, also known as social media, is a term for technology and systems that facilitate communication with user-generated content, resulting in new forms of social media. Government 2.0 can be seen as the use of Web 2.0 by a government that has decided – in the sense we like this paper – to facilitate government communication with citizens. Many communication schemes have already been set up at the intersection of government and citizens, but not all have been successful. The chances of achieving a successful 2.0 rule are influenced by several factors (Meijer, Koops, Pieterson, Overman, and Ten Tije, 2012). The only thing we can look at in this document is the main features of creating a 2.0 website, the amount of information that users must provide when logging in to the official 2.0 website.

The reason why we focus on the choice of information is that the documents supporting it are the basis for allowing trust, and trust is a necessary condition in this international context. Especially on the air, hope cannot be taken lightly; this must be emphasized. Because online communication involves distance communication, activities that encourage trust in our expectations may come when we meet face to face (Pettit, 2004). In this article, we look at the history of intimate relationships that Haenni et al. (2009, p. 40 et seq.) Describes the reliability of significant trustees, the trustworthy view of the trustee in appropriate circumstances. Religions have many facets; on this page, we are interested in the main categories or opportunities that hope may have in the future: availability (is a trustee on demand?)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *